Larde v. USA

Filing 19

ORDER, re 17 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Proper Service filed by USA, directing Plaintiff to respond to this pending motion, & provide proof that he has completed service upon the U.S. Attorney in Little Rock & the Attorney General of the U.S. in Washington, D.C., on or before 6/15/11. Failure to complete service or respond to the Court's Order may result in dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/25/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ROBERT LARDE V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:10CV00212 JMM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEFENDANT ORDER On September 7, 2010, Plaintiff filed his Complaint against the United States of America alleging medical malpractice against the Department of Veterans Affairs for the care and treatment he received at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Memphis, Tennessee. Plaintiff has failed to properly serve the United States as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 4(i), Plaintiff must served the United States Attorney in Little Rock with a copy of both the summons and complaint and must served a copy of both the summons and complaint to the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(A) (emphasis added). Plaintiff has only served the United States Attorney in Little Rock with a copy of the summons. There is a pending Motion to Dismiss based upon this failure to complete service in a timely manner. Plaintiff is directed to respond to this pending motion and provide proof that he has completed service upon the United States Attorney in Little Rock and the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C. on or before June 15, 2011. Failure to complete service or respond to the Court’s Order may result in dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff’s complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25 day of May , 2011. James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?