Brewer v. McCann et al
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING 31 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of U.S. Magistrate Judge H. David Young in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed to jury trial on his claims of excessive force against De fendant Rick Webb, & denial of adequate medical care against Defendants John Smith, Jeremy Sparks & Debra McMullin. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jack McCann are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to introduce sufficient evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a jury, & McCann's name is removed as a party Defendant. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/28/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
NICKLELAS NECESSITY BREWER
ADC #116152
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO: 3:10CV00245 SWW/HDY
JACK McCANN et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After
carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the
Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Plaintiff is allowed to proceed to jury trial on his claims of excessive force against
Defendant Rick Webb, and denial of adequate medical care against Defendants John Smith, Jeremy
Sparks, and Debra McMullin.
2.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Jack McCann are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE for failure to introduce sufficient evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a
jury, and McCann’s name is removed as a party Defendant.
DATED this 28th day of June, 2011.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?