Rhoades v. Bradley et al

Filing 7

JUDGMENT, pursuant to 6 Order of Dismissal entered this date, Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Bradley & Langston are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, & his claims against Defendants Bray & McGuire are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike", as defined by 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment & the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/3/2010. (jct)

Download PDF
Rhoades v. Bradley et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION BILLY W. RHOADES v. No. 3:10CV00249 JLH DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF JOHN BRADLEY, Mississippi County Public Defender, et al. JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Bradley and Langston are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, and his claims against Defendants Bray and McGuire are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 3rd day of November, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?