Wilson v. Social Security Administration
ORDER, re 10 Plaintiff's Brief, directing Mr. Wilson to file a supplemental brief identifying the specific listing he claims to meet & providing citations to the evidence in the record that support his claim, w/i 14 days of the date of this Order. If Mr. Wilson fails to submit a supplemental brief w/i 14 days, the Court will assume that he has withdrawn this argument. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/29/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO.: 3:10CV00250 BD
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner,
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff Rodney Wilson argues in his brief (docket entry #10) that the
Administrative Law Judge erred at step three of the sequential evaluation process by
finding that he did not have an impairment (or combination of impairments) that met or
equaled a listed impairment. (#10 at p.6) Mr. Wilson does not, however, state what listed
impairment he meets. Nor does he direct the Court to any evidence in the record that
would support his assertion that he meets a listed impairment.
Mr. Wilson is ordered to file a supplemental brief identifying the specific listing he
claims to meet and providing citations to the evidence in the record that support his claim,
within fourteen days of the date of this order. If Mr. Wilson fails to submit a
supplemental brief within fourteen days, the Court will assume that Mr. Wilson has
withdrawn this argument. The Commissioner will have fourteen days from the date Mr.
Wilson files his supplemental brief to respond.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?