Guy et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al

Filing 51

ORDER granting 41 Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss.The Court notes that Plaintiffs' right to re-file the case against Defendant is subject to the provisions of Rule 41(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 41(d), the Plaintiffs may be ordered to pay any costs of this action which the Court deems appropriate upon filing the same claim against the same defendant. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 09/25/2012. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ADRIAN GUY, GABRIELLE GUY, and ESTELLA GUY V. PLAINTIFFS 3:10CV00255JMM STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.; WELLS FARGO AUTO FINANCE, LLC DEFENDANTS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs have filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss their case without prejudice. The Court finds that Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss should be, and hereby is, granted. (Docket # 41). The Clerk is directed to close the case. The Court notes that Plaintiffs’ right to re-file the case against Defendant is subject to the provisions of Rule 41(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 41(d), the Plaintiffs may be ordered to pay any costs of this action which the Court deems appropriate upon filing the same claim against the same defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2012. ___________________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?