Daniels et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company

Filing 10

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice pursuant to settlement. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/29/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
FILED u.s. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTR!CT ARKANSAS AUG 29 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICf COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DMSION GREGORY ALLEN DANIELS AND NIKKI RAE DANIELS VS. ~A~ES~ W:~ACKI CLERK y DEP CLERK PLAINTIFF NO. 3:JOcvOO297 JLH STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY DEFENDANT CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL On this day, this matter comes on for hearing with the parties appearing by their attorneys announcing that all matters in dispute in this case have been settled and that this case should be dismissed. It appearing. to the Court that the parties have consented to the entry of this Order, the Court hereby FINDS AND ORDERS the following: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter herein and venue is 2. Pursuant to the stipulation ofthe parties, the Court hereby FINDS, ORDERS, AND proper. ADJUDGES that all claims, demands, and causes ofaction which were asserted or might have been asserted by the Plaintiffs, Gregory Allen Daniels and Nikki Rae Daniels, against the Defendant, State Fann Fire & Casualty Company, for personal property damages, including replacement costs, under Coverage B ofthe policy, and all claims for loss ofuse, including additional living expenses under Coverage C of the policy, arising out of any event occurring prior to the date of the entry of this Order should be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 3. Pursuant to the stipulation ofthe parties, the Court hereby FINDS AND ORDERS that, prior to the date of the filing ofthis action, State Farm paid to the Plaintiffs and their mortgage companythe sum ofOne Hundred TwelveThousand One Hundred Twenty-three and 0511 00 Dollars -2­ ($112.123.05). representing the agreed actual cash value ofthe dwelling damaged in the fire. which occurred on or about April 20.2010. but that the residence has not yet been rebuilt with similar construction. Accordingly. pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. the Court finds that the agreed dismissal of Plaintiffs· claims as to Coverages B and C. as set forth above. shall not operate as a dismissal with prejudice as to any future claim Plaintiffs may hereafter assert against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. and shall not prejudice the right of State Farm Fire & Casualty Company to raise any defense or make any claim against Plaintiffs with regard to any remaining benefits which may be payable under Coverage A of the policy with regard to replacement cost. 4. Pursuant to the stipulation ofthe parties. it is the intention ofboth the Court and the parties that the entry of this Order shall operate to forever bar Plaintiffs from making any claim against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company under Coverages B and C ofthe policy. which is the subject matter of this action. but shall not operate to bar Plaintiffs from making any claim against State Farm under Coverage A ofthe Policy. nor shall it operate to bar State Farm from asserting any defenses or making any claims against Plaintiffs under Coverage A ofthe subject policy. 5. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. the Court hereby FINDS AND ORDERS that each party shall be responsible for payment ofthe attorney fees and court costs incurred by that party prior to the date ofthe entry of this Order. IT IS SO CONSIDERED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDGED this ~q~ day of ~SI­ 2011. Leon Hobnes, Judge States District Court -3- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: BRANCH. THOMPSON, 'VARi\IATH & DALE, P.A. 414 West Court Street Paragould, Arkansas 72450 By: /JI1J?'~ Robert F. Thompson III AlTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS REID, BURGE, PREYALLET & COLEMAN 417 North Broadwuy, P. O. Box J07 Blytheville. Arkansas 72316-0107 Telephone: (870) 763-4586 Fax: (870) 763-4642 E-mail: rbpcmisbce.lobnl.net B)': ~/~,------Robert L. Coleman, No. 80031 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?