Peoples v. Osceola Police Department et al
ORDER, pursuant to Plaintiff's failure to comply with 11 Order, the Court dismisses his complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/29/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ALLEN CHANTELL PEOPLES
Case No. 3:10-cv-306-DPM
OSCEOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT
and BLYTHEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
In its 17 March 2011 Order, the Court granted Allen Peoples's motion
to proceed in forma pauperis. Document No.7. Because Peoples's complaint
was too vague and conclusory to determine whether it was frivolous, failed
to state a claim, or stated a cause of action, the Court directed him to file an
amended complaint within thirty days. The Court advised Peoples that
failing to file an amended complaint could result in dismissal without
prejudice. Peoples sought, Document No. 10, and the Court granted, Document
No. 11, more time to amend. In that Order, the Court directed Peoples to file
his amended complaint by 18 May 2011, noting again that the case could be
dismissed without prejudice if he failed to file.
Peoples has not filed an amended complaint. He has not prosecuted his
case diligently. And the Court therefore dismisses his complaint without
prejudice. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?