Peoples v. Osceola Police Department et al

Filing 13

ORDER, pursuant to Plaintiff's failure to comply with 11 Order, the Court dismisses his complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/29/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ALLEN CHANTELL PEOPLES ADC #134098 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:10-cv-306-DPM OSCEOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT and BLYTHEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT DEFENDANTS ORDER In its 17 March 2011 Order, the Court granted Allen Peoples's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Document No.7. Because Peoples's complaint was too vague and conclusory to determine whether it was frivolous, failed to state a claim, or stated a cause of action, the Court directed him to file an amended complaint within thirty days. The Court advised Peoples that failing to file an amended complaint could result in dismissal without prejudice. Peoples sought, Document No. 10, and the Court granted, Document No. 11, more time to amend. In that Order, the Court directed Peoples to file his amended complaint by 18 May 2011, noting again that the case could be dismissed without prejudice if he failed to file. Peoples has not filed an amended complaint. He has not prosecuted his case diligently. And the Court therefore dismisses his complaint without prejudice. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). So Ordered. ~(f. II D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?