Peoples v. Osceola Police Department et al

Filing 13

ORDER, pursuant to Plaintiff's failure to comply with 11 Order, the Court dismisses his complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/29/2011. (jct)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION

ALLEN CHANTELL PEOPLES

ADC #134098

v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 3:10-cv-306-DPM

OSCEOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT
and BLYTHEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
In its 17 March 2011 Order, the Court granted Allen Peoples's motion
to proceed in forma pauperis. Document No.7. Because Peoples's complaint
was too vague and conclusory to determine whether it was frivolous, failed
to state a claim, or stated a cause of action, the Court directed him to file an
amended complaint within thirty days. The Court advised Peoples that
failing to file an amended complaint could result in dismissal without
prejudice. Peoples sought, Document No. 10, and the Court granted, Document
No. 11, more time to amend. In that Order, the Court directed Peoples to file

his amended complaint by 18 May 2011, noting again that the case could be
dismissed without prejudice if he failed to file.
Peoples has not filed an amended complaint. He has not prosecuted his

case diligently. And the Court therefore dismisses his complaint without
prejudice. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
So Ordered.

~(f.
II

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

-2­