Evance v. Trumann Health Services LLC et al
Filing
36
PROTECTIVE ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation and Agreement regarding confidential information in this cause of action. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/12/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JENNY EVANCE
PLAINTIFF
V.
NO. 3:11CV00025-JMM
TRUMANN HEALTH SERVICES, LLC
fictitiously known as TRUMANN HEALTH
AND REHABILITATION CENTER;
BETTY BEGLEY; GLADIS CORTINAS;
JACKIE KELLY; JACKY HOLT;
DAYNA SHROUT and HAROLD McMICKLE
DEFENDANTS
PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT
On this 12th day of October, 2011, the Court reviewed the stipulation and agreement for
a Protective Order between Plaintiff, Jenny Evance, and Defendants, Trumann Health Services,
LLC, fictitiously known as Trumann Health and Rehabilitation Center (Trumann Health); Betty
Begley; Gladis Cortinas; Jackie Kelly; Jacky Holt; Dayna Shrout; and Harold McMickle, and
makes the following Orders:
1.
Confidential Information, as later defined herein, and produced by either party or
pursuant to a release for medical or employment records in this action, shall be used only for the
purpose of this litigation and for no other purpose whatsoever, and shall not be given, shown,
made available, or communicated in any way to anyone except Qualified Persons, as herein
defined.
2.
Confidential Information shall be deemed to include, without limitation:
a)
Personnel records, medical records and reports, financial records,
company
policies,
company
financial
information,
proprietary
information, customer information, account information, trade secrets,
operational methods and other matters now requested or hereinafter
requested by the parties or relating to the operation and organization of
182445-1
1
Separate Defendant Trumann Health and such other information as may
be deemed by this Court to be relevant or material herein.
b)
Any information concerning such as set forth in 2(a) herein above as may
be, from time to time, produced by the parties herein and designated by
the party at the time of production to be "Confidential Information" and
subject to this Order. Such designation is to be made by marking the
documents “CONFIDENTIAL.” Any document so marked shall not be
disclosed to any person except as may be permitted by this Protective
Order. The designation of any document as “CONFIDENTIAL” will be
made in good faith.
3.
Except with the prior written consent of the party or pursuant to further Order of
this Court on motion with notice to the party, no Confidential Information may be disclosed to
any person other than “Qualified Persons” who shall be defined to include:
a)
the parties;
b)
any current or future counsel of record for the parties in this action;
secretaries, paraprofessional assistants, and other employees of such
counsel who would be actively engaged in assisting counsel in connection
with this action;
c)
witnesses, including but not limited to persons requested by counsel to
furnish technical or other expert service, to give testimony or to otherwise
prepare for any deposition, hearing, trial, or any other proceeding in this
action; and
182445-1
2
d)
The Court and its personnel, including the stenographic reporters not
regularly employed by the Court who are engaged by the parties or the
Court during the litigation of this case.
The parties agree that if Confidential Information is disclosed to witnesses or prospective
witnesses during trial preparation, depositions, or the actual trial proceedings, the disclosing
party will advise the recipient of the information that he/she must keep the information
confidential except during depositions or the actual trial proceedings.
4.
This Order, insofar as it restricts the communication in any way and use of
Confidential Information, shall continue to be binding through and after the conclusion of this
litigation. At the conclusion of this action, including all appeals:
a)
At the end of three (3) years following the conclusion of this case, counsel
may destroy the Confidential Information or, prior to the expiration of the
three (3) year deadline, counsel may take all reasonable steps necessary to
reclaim
all
Confidential
Information,
including
correspondence,
memoranda, notes, or any other documents embodying such information,
in whole or in part, by requesting the return of all copies of such
Confidential Information and paying reasonable expenses for the return of
the documents.
b)
Counsel and all Qualified Persons are enjoined from disclosing in any
manner any Confidential Information obtained during the course of this
proceeding except as referenced in Paragraph 3 above.
5.
Nothing in this Order shall prevent any party from seeking modification of this
Order at any time as to specific matters designated "Confidential Information" to remove such
from the application of this Order.
182445-1
3
6.
Such Confidential Information as may be required to be filed with the Court and
with the Clerk of this Court shall be filed under seal. Only the Court, Court personnel, and
counsel for the parties shall have access to the sealed record in this proceeding until further
Order of this Court.
IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED.
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/Larry J. Steele
Larry J. Steele (#78146)
P.O. Box 561
Walnut Ridge, AR 72476-0561
(870) 886-5840
(870) 886-5873 fax
email: steelelaw7622@sbcglobal.net
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
JENNY EVANCE
/s/Missy McJunkins Duke
Missy McJunkins Duke (#99167)
Elizabeth Rowe Cummings (#07242)
Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C.
500 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 200
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone: (501) 371-9999
Facsimile: (501) 371-0035
E-mail: mduke@cgwg.com
E-mail: ecummings@cgwg.com
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
TRUMANN HEALTH SERVICES, LLC
fictitiously known as TRUMANN HEALTH
AND REHABILITATION CENTER;
BETTY BEGLEY; GLADIS CORTINAS;
JACKIE KELLY; JACKY HOLT;
DAYNA SHROUT and HAROLD McMICKLE
182445-1
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?