Vornes v. Cook et al

Filing 7

ORDER that Plaintiff shall notify this Court of his current address & his intent to continue prosecution with this action, pro se, within 30 days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/14/2011. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION TERRIEK A. VORNES, SR. v. PLAINTIFF 3:11-cv-00042-JLH-JTK DALE COOK, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On March 24, 2011, a copy of Plaintiff’s file-marked Amended Complaint which was mailed to him at his last-known address, was returned to sender (Doc. No. 6). Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), a pro se plaintiff must promptly notify the Clerk of the Court and other parties of any change in his address, and must monitor the progress of the case and prosecute it diligently. Furthermore, the Local Rule provides for the dismissal without prejudice of any action in which communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty days. Although Plaintiff has apparently changed his address, this Order will be sent to his lastknown address. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall notify this Court of his current address and his intent to continue prosecution with this action, pro se, within thirty days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of April, 2011. ____________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?