Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v Ramirez et al
ORDER granting 42 MOTION for Default Judgment against Robin S Ramirez and Kenneth Ramrirez filed by Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/20/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TENNESSEE FARMERS MUTUAL
KENNETH D. RAMIREZ, et al.
Defendants Kenneth D. Ramirez and Robin S. Ramirez (collectively “Defendants”) have
failed to plead or otherwise defend this action. On April 3, 2012, default was entered by the Clerk
of the Court as to Defendants. Pending is Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 42).
Defendants have not responded, and the time for doing so has passed. Plaintiff's Motion is
It is proper under Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that a default judgment
be entered against Kenneth Ramirez and Robin Ramirez. Plaintiff's complaint sought a declaratory
judgment, on which I now find in favor of Plaintiff, that under the terms of the homeowner's
insurance policy issued to Kenneth D. Ramirez and Robin S. Ramirez, Plaintiff owes no duty of
any kind or nature whatsoever including, but not limited to, a duty to defend any legal action which
may have been or may hereafter be brought against Kenneth D. Ramirez or Robin S. Ramirez for
the events occurring on October 21, 2008; and has no obligation to satisfy, in whole or in part, any
claim that has been, could have been or might be asserted against Kenneth D. Ramirez or Robin S.
Ramirez, or to satisfy in whole or in part any judgment that has been obtained or that might be
obtained against Kenneth D. Ramirez or Robin S. Ramirez or to indemnify Kenneth D. Ramirez or
Robin S. Ramirez in any way for any damages or losses which may have been sustained as a result
of the events occurring on October 21, 2008.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of April, 2012.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson_______________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?