Gray et al v. McKann et al
Filing
70
ORDER directing Plaintiff Bashford to notify this Court of his current address & his intent to continue prosecution with this action, pro se, within 30 days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff Bashford from this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/9/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
RUBBY JAMES GRAY, ADC #500127,
and PAUL BASHFORD
v.
PLAINTIFFS
3:11-cv-00061-JMM-JTK
JACK MCKANN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On September 6, 2011, a copy of the August 24, 2011 Order which was mailed to Plaintiff
Bashford at his last-known address, was returned to sender (Doc. No. 65).
Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), a pro se plaintiff must promptly notify the Clerk of the
Court and other parties of any change in his address, and must monitor the progress of the case and
prosecute it diligently. Furthermore, the Local Rule provides for the dismissal without prejudice of
any action in which communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within
thirty days. Although Plaintiff Bashford has apparently changed his address, this Order will be sent
to his last-known address. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff Bashford shall notify this Court of his current
address and his intent to continue prosecution with this action, pro se, within thirty days of the date
of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of Plaintiff Bashford
from this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of September, 2011.
____________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?