Gray et al v. McKann et al
Filing
93
ORDER directing Plaintiff Rubby Gray to file a Response to 89 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss within 15 days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond to the Motion may result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/22/2012. (jct)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
RUBBY JAMES GRAY,
ADC #500127
v.
PLAINTIFF
3:11-cv-00061-JMM-JTK
JACK MCKANN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Plaintiff Rubby Gray shall file a Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 89)
within fifteen days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond to the Motion may result in the
dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff’s Complaint, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule
5.5(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of February, 2012.
______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
