Gregg v. Social Security Administration
ORDER granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $2,893.92 in attorney's fees and expenses under the EAJA. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/5/2012. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RHONDA S. GREGG
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion requesting an award of attorney’s
fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”).1 (Docket entry
#17.) The Commissioner has filed a Response. (Docket entry #19.)
Plaintiff's attorney, Anthony Bartels, requests a total award of $2,893.92
consisting of: (1) 13.80 hours of attorney work in 2011 and 2012 at the adjusted
hourly rate of $181.00 ($2,497.80); (2) 5.05 hours of paralegal work at the hourly rate
of $75.00 ($378.75); and (3) $17.37 in expenses for serving Plaintiff’s Complaint via
certified mail. He also requests that the award be mailed directly to him based on an
assignment executed by Plaintiff.
The Commissioner does not object to the requested amount of fees and
On June 14, 2012, the Court entered a Memorandum Order and Judgment reversing
the Commissioner’s decision and remanding this case for further administrative proceedings.
(Docket entries #15, #16.)
Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130
S. Ct. 2521 (2010), an award of EAJA fees belongs to the prevailing party, not that
party’s lawyer. Consistent with the Commissioner’s usual procedure, the check
awarding EAJA fees should be made payable to Plaintiff, but mailed to the care of
Plaintiff’s attorney at the attorney’s office.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of
Attorney’s Fees and Expenses Under the EAJA (docket entry #17) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $2,893.92 in attorney's
fees and expenses under the EAJA.
DATED this 5th day of October, 2012.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?