Davison v. Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $3,760.35, together with expenses in the amount of $17.37, for a total of $3,777.72, pursuant to the EAJA. The Commissioner is directed to certify said award and pay Plaintiff (in care of his attorney) in this amount. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/1/2012. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION CHAD DAVISON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:11-CV-00117 JTK ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES On August 15, 2012, the Court entered an Order reversing the decision of the Commissioner and remanding the case for further proceedings. Plaintiff’s counsel has filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. He seeks compensation for 18.6 hours of work performed at a rate of $181 per hour, 5.25 hours of paralegal hours work performed at a rate of $75 per hour, and expenses in the amount of $17.37. The Commissioner has indicated that he does not have any objections to the motion. (Doc. No. 21). The Court has reviewed the fee request and does not believe that it is excessive or inaccurate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,760.35, together with expenses in the amount of $17.37, for a total of $3,777.72, pursuant to the EAJA. The Commissioner is directed to certify said award and pay Plaintiff (in care of his attorney) in this amount. SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2012. ________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?