Nassar et al v. Jackson et al
Filing
191
JUDGMENT consistent with 190 Order, noting a clerical error in the first amended judgment as to Plaintiff Ray Nassar, 189 , it is hereby ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff Ray Nassar have and recover the accepted remitted amount of $245,63 9.38 in compensatory damages from defendants Hughes School District and Earnestine Jackson, jointly and severally, and $2,500 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages against defendant Earnestine Jackson, individually. Post- judgment interest shall continue to accrue at the rate of.14% per annum. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/3/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
RAY NASSAR and GENA SMITH,
Plaintiffs
V.
EARNESTINE JACKSON, individually
and in her official capacity as a Hughes
School Board Member, ET AL.
Defendants
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NO: 3:11CV00133 SWW
SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT as to PLAINTIFF RAY NASSAR
Consistent with the order entered May 29, 2015 [ECF No. 190] noting a clerical error in
the first amended judgment as to Plaintiff Ray Nassar [ECF No. 189],1 IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Ray Nassar have and recover the accepted remitted
amount of $245,639.38 in compensatory damages from defendants Hughes School District and
Earnestine Jackson, jointly and severally, and $2,500 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in
punitive damages against defendant Earnestine Jackson, individually. Post-judgment interest
shall continue to accrue at the rate of .14% per annum.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2015.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
The first amended judgment as to plaintiff Ray Nassar incorrectly includes a damage
award against Defendant Jimmy Wilkins, individually. By order entered March 28, 2013, the
Court set aside the jury finding regarding Wilkins's liability for defamation and the related
verdicts for compensatory and punitive damages.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?