Nassar et al v. Jackson et al

Filing 191

JUDGMENT consistent with 190 Order, noting a clerical error in the first amended judgment as to Plaintiff Ray Nassar, 189 , it is hereby ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff Ray Nassar have and recover the accepted remitted amount of $245,63 9.38 in compensatory damages from defendants Hughes School District and Earnestine Jackson, jointly and severally, and $2,500 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages against defendant Earnestine Jackson, individually. Post- judgment interest shall continue to accrue at the rate of.14% per annum. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/3/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION RAY NASSAR and GENA SMITH, Plaintiffs V. EARNESTINE JACKSON, individually and in her official capacity as a Hughes School Board Member, ET AL. Defendants * * * * * * * * * * * * NO: 3:11CV00133 SWW SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT as to PLAINTIFF RAY NASSAR Consistent with the order entered May 29, 2015 [ECF No. 190] noting a clerical error in the first amended judgment as to Plaintiff Ray Nassar [ECF No. 189],1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Ray Nassar have and recover the accepted remitted amount of $245,639.38 in compensatory damages from defendants Hughes School District and Earnestine Jackson, jointly and severally, and $2,500 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages against defendant Earnestine Jackson, individually. Post-judgment interest shall continue to accrue at the rate of .14% per annum. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2015. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 The first amended judgment as to plaintiff Ray Nassar incorrectly includes a damage award against Defendant Jimmy Wilkins, individually. By order entered March 28, 2013, the Court set aside the jury finding regarding Wilkins's liability for defamation and the related verdicts for compensatory and punitive damages.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?