Mills v. Clay County Detention Center et al
Filing
29
ORDER dismissing as moot 25 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS due to the parties consent to the exercise of jurisdction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge; GRANTING 21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kalem Rouse. Plaintiff's claims against Kalem Rouse are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/26/2011. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
FREDERICK A. MILLS
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO. 3:11CV00154-BD
CLAY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and F.R.Civ.P. 73. (Docket entry #27) Because the case
has now been moved to this Court’s docket for trial, the Partial Recommended Disposition (#25)
is now moot.
Now pending is Defendant Kalem Rouse’s motion to dismiss. (#21) He argues that,
although he was named as a Defendant in Mr. Mills’s original complaint, he was not named as a
Defendant in the amended complaint. Noting that an amended complaint supercedes an original
complaint, Mr. Rouse asks that Mr. Mills’s claims against him be dismissed. Mr. Mills has
responded to the motion and agrees that Mr. Rouse should be dismissed. (#24)
Mr. Rouse’s motion to dismiss (#21) is GRANTED. Mr. Mills’s claims against Mr.
Rouse are DISMISSED, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2011.
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?