Davis v. Allen et al

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants' 21 Motion to Dismiss is granted and Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Further, the court certifies that an informa pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/13/2012. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION WILFRED DREXAL DAVIS v. PLAINTIFF 3:11-cv-00213-SWW-JJV MIKE ALLEN, Sheriff, Crittenden County; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and an accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 13th day of November, 2012. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?