Evans v. Crittenden Regional Hospital et al
Filing
32
ORDER vacating 28 Order on Motion in Limine. Further, Defendants' 24 MOTION in Limine is denied without prejudice. Although plaintiff has clearly stated that she did not rely on what appears to be a typographical error contained in def endants' leave policy, this is an issue best left for cross examination and it would be improper to preclude plaintiff from addressing it at trial. Defendants may, however, object to this evidence at trial and preserve its record for appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/7/2012. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
MARISSA EVANS
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:11CV00229 BSM
CRITTENDEN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Upon reconsideration sua sponte, the order [Doc. No. 28] granting defendants’ motion
in limine is vacated and the motion in limine [Doc. No. 24] is denied without prejudice.
Although plaintiff has clearly stated that she did not rely on what appears to be a
typographical error contained in defendants’ leave policy, this is an issue best left for cross
examination and it would be improper to preclude plaintiff from addressing it at trial.
Defendants may, however, object to this evidence at trial and preserve its record for appeal.
IT SO ORDERED this 7th day of December 2012.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?