Evans v. Crittenden Regional Hospital et al

Filing 32

ORDER vacating 28 Order on Motion in Limine. Further, Defendants' 24 MOTION in Limine is denied without prejudice. Although plaintiff has clearly stated that she did not rely on what appears to be a typographical error contained in def endants' leave policy, this is an issue best left for cross examination and it would be improper to preclude plaintiff from addressing it at trial. Defendants may, however, object to this evidence at trial and preserve its record for appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/7/2012. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
MARISSA EVANS
v.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:11CV00229 BSM

CRITTENDEN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Upon reconsideration sua sponte, the order [Doc. No. 28] granting defendants’ motion
in limine is vacated and the motion in limine [Doc. No. 24] is denied without prejudice.
Although plaintiff has clearly stated that she did not rely on what appears to be a
typographical error contained in defendants’ leave policy, this is an issue best left for cross
examination and it would be improper to preclude plaintiff from addressing it at trial.
Defendants may, however, object to this evidence at trial and preserve its record for appeal.
IT SO ORDERED this 7th day of December 2012.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE