Williams v. Edwards et al
ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 9 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. It is hereby certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order & the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/2/2012. (jct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ROBERT WILLIAMS, JR., ADC #658164
CASE NO. 3:12CV00003 BSM
PAULINE H. EDWARDS et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 17] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections were filed.
After carefully considering this document and making a de novo review of the record, it is
concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby
are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s amended complaint [Doc. No. 9] is DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint constitutes a “strike” within the meaning
of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
It is hereby certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this order and the judgment dismissing this action would not be taken
in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of April 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?