Gregory v. Gentry et al
Filing
94
ORDER denying 93 Plaintiff's Motion for Criminal Charges to be Assessed Thru Federal Grand Jury. The Clerk of the Court is directed to not accept any further motions from Plaintiff asking for criminal charges to be assessed through the grand jury. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 08/27/2012. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JAMES C. GREGORY
v.
PLAINTIFF
3:12-CV-00013-BRW
CODY GENTRY, Individually and as a
Police Officer for the City of Blytheville,
Arkansas, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Pending is pro se Plaintiff’s Motion for Criminal Charges to be Assessed Thru Federal
Grand Jury (Doc. No. 93). Plaintiff filed identical Motions on August 15 and August 21, 2012,1
which were denied.2
Plaintiff asserts that Defendants Cody Gentry and Ross Thompson conspired against the
rights of a citizen, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241. Plaintiff asks that this Court order a grand jury
be summoned under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(a) to investigate the alleged criminal
actions. While the authority to convene a grand jury is vested in the District Court, I again
decline to exercise that authority under these circumstances. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for
Criminal Charges to be Assessed (Doc. No. 93) is, again, DENIED.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to not accept any further motions from Plaintiff asking
for criminal charges to be assessed through the grand jury.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2012.
/s/Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Doc. No. 86.
2
Doc. No. 87, 92.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?