Roedel v. Craighead County Detention Center

Filing 5

ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to monitor & prosecute this action. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/9/2012. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION PLAINTIFF ADAM RAY ROEDEL v. No. 3:12-cv-51-DPM CRAIGHEAD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER DEFENDANT ORDER The Court issued an Order in May warning Roedel that his case would be dismissed unless he paid the filing fee or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Document No. 2. That Order was mailed to Roedel but returned by the postal service. Document No.4. More than 30 days have passed with no word from Roedel. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) provides that a prose litigant must "promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, ... monitor the progress of the case, and ... prosecute or defend the action diligently." Because Roedel has failed to do so, the Court dismisses his complaint without prejudice. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 'j ~~Old-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?