White v. Rice Belt Telephone Company Inc

Filing 27

ORDER dismissing with prejudice this action in its entirety with the parties to bear their own legal fees and costs. This matter is therefore removed from the Court's trial docket for the week of 5/9/2016. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/19/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION GLYNDA WHITE v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:12-cv-00062-KGB RICE BELT TELEPHONE CO., INC. _________________________________________ RICE BELT TELEPHONE CO., INC. DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF v. ROBERT C. PIERSON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice as to all remaining claims (Dkt. No. 26). On March 13, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation confirming that plaintiff Glynda White’s causes of action had been compromised, that all terms of settlement had been performed, and that her complaint could be dismissed with prejudice (Dkt. No. 20). The Court granted the motion for dismissal and dismissed with prejudice Ms. White’s complaint as to defendant Rice Belt Telephone Co., Inc. (“Rice Belt”) (Dkt. No. 21). Rice Belt’s third party complaint against Robert C. Pierson remained pending. The current stipulation states that Rice Belt and Mr. Pierson have now compromised all claims and causes of action remaining between them and that all terms of the settlement have been performed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the Court dismisses with prejudice this action in its entirety with the parties to bear their own legal fees and costs. This matter is therefore removed from the Court’s trial docket for the week of May 9, 2016. So ordered this 19th day of February, 2016. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?