Chandler et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc et al
Filing
80
ORDER denying 76 Motion to Compel. If the lawyers are unable to resolve their disputes, Plaintiffs may file a new motion with the Court. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/3/2013. (jak)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
TED AND MARTHA CHANDLER
VS.
PLAINTIFFS
3:12-CV-00104-BRW
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Pending is Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Compel against Defendants APAC-Tennessee
Inc. (Doc. No. 76). Since the Motion was filed, Plaintiffs’ lawyer, Mr. John Ogles, has advised
the Court that APAC need not respond because the parties are in the midst of resolving their
disputes.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED without prejudice. If the lawyers are unable
to resolve their disputes, Plaintiffs may file a new motion with the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of September, 2013.
/s/Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
