Mitchell v. Postal Service (U.S.)

Filing 32

ORDER pursuant to 28 Plaintiff Mitchell's Motion to reconsider the Order of dismissal and to reopen the case is denied as moot. The case previously was dismissed without prejudice, is closed, and judgment has been entered. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/11/2012. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION GERALD W. MITCHELL v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:12-cv-00106-KGB PATRICK R. DONAHOE, POSTMASTER GENERAL UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE DEFENDANT ORDER By Order dated November 9, 2012, the Court dismissed without prejudice Mr. Mitchell’s complaint and all claims in this action (Dkt. No. 26). Judgment was entered accordingly (Dkt. No. 27). On November 19, 2012, the Court received from Mr. Mitchell a letter (Dkt. No. 28) that the Court construed as a motion to reconsider the order of dismissal and to reopen the case (Dkt. No. 29). The Court directed the defendant to respond to Mr. Mitchell’s motion (Dkt. No. 29). Defendant complied (Dkt. No. 30). On December 7, 2012, Mr. Mitchell again asked the Court to dismiss his case without prejudice (Dkt. No. 31). Pursuant to Mr. Mitchell’s previous requests (Dkt. Nos. 21, 24), this case previously was dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 26). The only matter pending before the Court is Mr. Mitchell’s motion to reconsider the order of dismissal and to reopen the case (Dkt. No. 29). Because Mr. Mitchell’s latest filing again asks the Court to dismiss the case, the motion to reconsider the order of dismissal and to reopen the case is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 29). The case previously was dismissed without prejudice, is closed, and judgment has been entered. SO ORDERED this the 11th day of December, 2012. ____________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?