Elliott Electric Supply Inc v. LRE/Royal Electric LLC et al

Filing 70

ORDER pursuant to 69 Stipulation of Dismissal, Employers Mutual Casualty Company's 14 Complaint and 47 Amended Complaint against third party defendants Willie D. Godwin, Brenda J. Godwin, Lawrence Dean Wallace, and Marilyn K. Wallace are dismissed without prejudice.Each party will bear its own costs and attorney's fees. The remaining parties may proceed according to 40 Scheduling Order. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/12/2013. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ELLIOTT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:12CV00146 BSM LRE/ROYAL ELECTRIC, LLC d/b/a LRE Royal Electric, LLC et al. DEFENDANTS EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY CO. CROSS-CLAIMANT v. LRE/ROYAL ELECTRIC, LLC d/b/a LRE Royal Electric, LLC et al. CROSS-DEFENDANT EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY CO. THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF v. LAWRENCE DEAN WALLACE et al. THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal [Doc. No. 69], third-party plaintiff Employers Mutual Casualty Company’s (“EMCC”) complaint [Doc. No. 14] and amended complaint [Doc. No. 47] against third-party defendants Willie D. Godwin, Brenda J. Godwin, Lawrence Dean Wallace, and Marilyn K. Wallace are dismissed. EMCC’s claim to be indemnified for the amount it paid to plaintiff Elliot Electric Supply, Inc. pursuant to its payment bond, is dismissed with prejudice. All of EMCC’s remaining claims against Willie D. Godwin, Brenda J. Godwin, Lawrence Dean Wallace, and Marilyn K. Wallace, are dismissed without prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. The remaining parties may proceed according to the scheduling order [Doc. No. 40]. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of August 2013. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?