Ferguson v. Proassurance Indemnity Company Inc et al

Filing 57

ORDER granting 36 Defendant's First Motion in Limine. Based on the parties' agreements, the first four requests are granted. However, Plaintiff may attempt to impeach Dr. Mabry's testimony by attacking his credibility or with evidence of bias to the extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 04/04/2013. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ANDREA WEST FERGUSON VS. PLAINTIFF 3:12-CV-00170-BRW ROBERT L. WARNER, JR., M.D. DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is Defendant’s First Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 36). Defendant requests that evidence of the following be excluded: (1) Defendant’s liability insurance; (2) any prior malpractice suits against Defendant; (3) that Defendant, as a physician in a malpractice suit, is not required to be a witness against himself; and (4) any current or past malpractice suits against Defendant’s expert witnesses.1 In response, Plaintiff states that she will not refer to Defendant’s liability insurance, any prior malpractice suits against Defendant, or Defendant’s right to not offer standard of care opinions.2 Thus, based on the parties’ agreements, Defendant’s first three requests are GRANTED. Regarding Defendant’s fourth request, Plaintiff concedes that she will not refer to current or past malpractice suits against Defendant’s expert witnesses; however, Plaintiff states that she intents to question one of Defendant’s expert witnesses (Dr. Charles Mabry) about earlier testimony he gave in unrelated medical-malpractice cases.3 Defendant objects to this questioning 1 Doc. No. 36. 2 Doc. No. 42. 3 Id. 1 and argues that it is irrelevant and would unfairly prejudice Defendant.4 To the extent of the parties’ agreement, Defendant’s fourth request is GRANTED. However, Plaintiff may attempt to impeach Dr. Mabry’s testimony by attacking his credibility or with evidence of bias to the extent permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2013. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 Doc. No. 52. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?