Fowler et al v. Coleman et al
ORDER directing Plaintiff's Fowler, Braddock, and Wells to notify this Court of their current addresses and their intent to continue prosecution with this action pro se within thirty days of this Order. Failure to comply shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/8/2013. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PAUL FOWLER, SHINDID BRADDOCK
and WILLIE WELLS
RONNIE COLEMAN, et al.
On December 28, 2012, copies of the December 11, 2012 Order which were mailed to the
three Plaintiffs at their last-known addresses, were returned to Sender (Doc. Nos. 14, 15, 17).
Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), a pro se plaintiff must promptly notify the Clerk of the
Court and other parties of any change in his address, and must monitor the progress of the case and
prosecute it diligently. Furthermore, the Local Rule provides for the dismissal without prejudice
of any action in which communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within
thirty days. Although Plaintiffs have apparently changed their addresses, this Order will be sent to
their last-known addresses. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiffs Fowler, Braddock, and Wells shall notify
this Court of their current addresses and their intent to continue prosecution with this action, pro se,
within thirty days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the
dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2013.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?