Fowler et al v. Coleman et al

Filing 5

ORDER construing 4 Response filed by Willie Wells as a request for an extension of time. Therefore, Wells shall have an additional fifteen days from the date of this Order in which to file an in forma pauperis Motion. Failure to file such shall result in his dismissal from the Complaint, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/19/2012. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION PAUL FOWLER, et al. v. PLAINTIFFS 3:12-cv-00228-BSM-JTK RONNIE COLEMAN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Co-Plaintiff Willie Wells has filed a Response (Doc. No. 4) to the Court’s October 5, 2012 Order (Doc. No. 3) directing him to submit an in forma pauperis motion. The Court construes his Response as a request for an extension of time. Therefore, Wells shall have an additional fifteen days from the date of this Order in which to file an in forma pauperis Motion. Failure to file such shall result in his dismissal from the Complaint, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of November, 2012. ______________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?