Fowler et al v. Coleman et al
Filing
5
ORDER construing 4 Response filed by Willie Wells as a request for an extension of time. Therefore, Wells shall have an additional fifteen days from the date of this Order in which to file an in forma pauperis Motion. Failure to file such shall result in his dismissal from the Complaint, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/19/2012. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
PAUL FOWLER, et al.
v.
PLAINTIFFS
3:12-cv-00228-BSM-JTK
RONNIE COLEMAN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Co-Plaintiff Willie Wells has filed a Response (Doc. No. 4) to the Court’s October 5, 2012
Order (Doc. No. 3) directing him to submit an in forma pauperis motion. The Court construes his
Response as a request for an extension of time. Therefore, Wells shall have an additional fifteen
days from the date of this Order in which to file an in forma pauperis Motion. Failure to file such
shall result in his dismissal from the Complaint, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of November, 2012.
______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?