Fowler et al v. Coleman et al
ORDER directing Plaintiff to respond to 55 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss within fifteen days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond may result in the dismissal without prejudice of this action, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 04/25/2013. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RONNIE COLEMAN, et al.
Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 55) within fifteen days
of the date of this Order. Failure to respond may result in the dismissal without prejudice of this
action, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
The Clerk shall change the style of this action to Wells v. Coleman, et al.1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of April, 2013.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The other three Plaintiffs to this action have been dismissed (Doc. Nos. 11, 52).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?