Wells v. Payment et al
ORDER ADOPTING 38 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, defts' 32 Motion to Dismiss and for Costs, or alternative Motion to Stay, is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/19/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PAUL PAYMENT, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, and a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the
proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss and for costs, or
alternative motion to stay, is DENIED without prejudice (Dkt. No. 32).
DATED this 19th day of July, 2013.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?