Clark v. Hustafer et al

Filing 33

ORDER directing the Clerk to redocket 27 Plaintiff's "Letter" as "Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment" and 28 "Letter" as "Plaintiff's Supporting Exhibit". Plaintiff must file on or befor e May 10, 2013, a Response to 30 Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Service on Felix. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to timely and properly do so, Defendant Felix will be dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 04/15/2013. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION DAVID M. CLARK, ADC #930765 V. PLAINTIFF 3:13CV00012 SWW/JTR TOMMY HUSTAFER, Jailer, Greene County Detention Center, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff, David M. Clark, is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this § 1983 action. On March 28 and 29, 2013, the Court received two untitled documents, which the Clerk docketed as “Letters” from Plaintiff. See Docs. #27 and #28. After reading those documents, the Court concludes that they are more properly characterized as Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and a supporting Exhibit. The Court will direct the Clerk to redocket them accordingly. On April 4, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion arguing that Defendant Felix has not been properly served. See Doc. #30. Plaintiff has thirty days to file a Response to that Motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk is directed to redocket Plaintiff’s March 28, 2013 “Letter” (Doc. #27) as “Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment” and his March 29, 2013 “Letter” (Doc. #28) as “Plaintiff’s Supporting Exhibit.” 2. Plaintiff must file, on or before May 10, 2013, a Response to Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Service on Felix (Doc. #30). 3. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to timely and properly do so, Defendant Felix will be dismissed, without prejudice. Dated this 15th day of April, 2013. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?