Mason v. Hitt et al
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal is considered a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 02/15/2013. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
CLARENCE MASON,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Plaintiff,
v.
BECKY HITT, Jail Administrator, Poinsett
County Jail; et al.
Defendants.
No. 3:13-cv-00020-SWW-JJV
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No timely objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted.
2.
This dismissal is considered a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation
Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment
dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
DATED this 15th day of February, 2013.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?