Johnson v. Arkansas, State of et al
Filing
44
JUDGMENT pursuant to 43 Order dismissing Jackie D. Johnson's claims against the State of Arkansas with prejudice, while his claims against Randolph County, Arkansas, and the City of Pocahontas, Arkansas, are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/31/2013. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JACKIE D. JOHNSON
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:13CV00063 JLH
STATE OF ARKANSAS;
RANDOLPH COUNTY, ARKANSAS;
and CITY OF POCAHONTAS, ARKANSAS
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered separately today, Jackie D. Johnson’s claims
against the State of Arkansas are dismissed with prejudice, while his claims against Randolph County,
Arkansas, and the City of Pocahontas, Arkansas, are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2013.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?