Masterson v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company

Filing 13

ORDER granting 7 Defendant's Motion to Stay. Accordingly, neither party is obligated to answer discovery requests served before the Rule 26(f) conference. Both parties must wait until after their Rule 26(f) conference to conduct discovery. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 04/05/2013. (jak)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION WILLIAM MASTERSON VS. PLAINTIFF 3:13-CV-00079-BRW STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery Request (Doc. No. 7). Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, neither party is obligated to answer discovery requests served before the Rule 26(f) conference. Both parties must wait until after their Rule 26(f) conference to conduct discovery. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2013. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?