Vornes v. Whitfield et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING 12 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rules 5.5(c)(2). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/21/2013. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION TERRICK A. VORNES ADC #112874 v. PLAINTIFF NO: 3:13CV00134 JLH LUTHER WHITFIELD et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 21st day of August, 2013. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?