Roland v. Coleman et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal is considered a "strike". The Court certifies than an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/31/2013. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
MICHAEL ROLAND
v.

PLAINTIFF
3:13CV00150-SWW-JTK

RONNIE COLEMAN, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2

This dismissal is considered a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison

Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and
Judgment

dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2013.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1