Rudd v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al

Filing 32

ORDER denying as moot 19 Motion to Compel. The Court will set new discovery deadlines, expert disclosure deadlines, dispositive motion deadlines, and a new trial date by separate order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/19/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION TERESA RUDD, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of CHAVIS CHACOBIE CARTER, deceased v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:13-cv-00173 KGB THE CITY OF JONESBORO, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER In its April 16, 2015, Order, the Court removed this case from the trial docket and stated that it would resolve plaintiff Teresa Rudd’s motion to compel and set new discovery deadlines and a trial date upon receiving status reports from the parties regarding discovery issues (Dkt. No. 27). In its status report, separate defendant the City of Jonesboro stated that the parties have now agreed that the City of Jonesboro will produce voluntarily certain items to be shipped to Ms. Rudd’s potential expert witness (Dkt. No. 31). Ms. Rudd has communicated to the Court that the parties’ agreement has resolved the issues raised in her motion to compel. Accordingly, the Court denies as moot Ms. Rudd’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 19). The Court will set new discovery deadlines, expert disclosure deadlines, dispositive motion deadlines, and a new trial date by separate order. SO ORDERED this 19th day of June, 2015. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?