Rudd v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al
Filing
32
ORDER denying as moot 19 Motion to Compel. The Court will set new discovery deadlines, expert disclosure deadlines, dispositive motion deadlines, and a new trial date by separate order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/19/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
TERESA RUDD, Individually
and as Administratrix
of the Estate of CHAVIS
CHACOBIE CARTER, deceased
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:13-cv-00173 KGB
THE CITY OF JONESBORO, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
In its April 16, 2015, Order, the Court removed this case from the trial docket and stated
that it would resolve plaintiff Teresa Rudd’s motion to compel and set new discovery deadlines
and a trial date upon receiving status reports from the parties regarding discovery issues (Dkt.
No. 27). In its status report, separate defendant the City of Jonesboro stated that the parties have
now agreed that the City of Jonesboro will produce voluntarily certain items to be shipped to Ms.
Rudd’s potential expert witness (Dkt. No. 31). Ms. Rudd has communicated to the Court that the
parties’ agreement has resolved the issues raised in her motion to compel. Accordingly, the
Court denies as moot Ms. Rudd’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 19). The Court will set new
discovery deadlines, expert disclosure deadlines, dispositive motion deadlines, and a new trial
date by separate order.
SO ORDERED this 19th day of June, 2015.
____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?