Payne v. Hitt et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Because Plaintiff failed to notify the Clerk of his change of address, the Court dismissed plaintiff's 2 Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/25/2013. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JOHN RUFUS PAYNE v. PLAINTIFF 3:13CV00184-SWW-JTK BECKY HITT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. The Clerk of the Court sent a copy of the proposed findings and recommendations to plaintiff. The mail was returned to the Clerk marked “Not at this Address.” Pro se plaintiffs have an obligation to inform the Clerk of any change in address. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Because plaintiff failed to notify the Clerk of his change of address, the Court dismisses plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?