Reed v. Hair et al

Filing 5

JUDGMENT consistent with 4 Order, this case is dismissed. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith, and that this dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/6/2013. (jak)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JOHN WILLIE REED, JR. ADC #155464 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:13CV00203 BSM SHAUN HAIR et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Consistent with the order that was entered this day, this case is dismissed. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith, and that this dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of November 2013. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?