Abram v. Allen et al
Filing
14
ORDER denying 13 Motion to Set Aside Order. Abram hasn't established any proper basis for Rule 60(b) relief from this Court's recent final Order and related Judgment. Abram's new claims and allegations are beyond the scope of his petition as amended. They are, therefore, not properly before the Court on a post-judgment motion. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/14/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
STACY S. ABRAM, IV
v.
PETITIONER
No. 3:13-cv-212-DPM
MIKE ALLEN, Sheriff, Crittenden County,
Arkansas; STATE OF ARKANSAS;
and RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas
Department of Correction
RESPONDENTS
ORDER
Motion for reconsideration, NQ 13, denied. Abram hasn't established
any proper basis for Rule 60(b) relief from this Court's recent final Order and
related Judgment. NQ 11 & 12. Abram's new claims and allegations are
beyond the scope of his petition as amended. NQ 2 & 10. They are, therefore,
not properly before the Court on a post-judgment motion.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.~'
United States District Judge
;'/
~
J-0/'f
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?