Abram v. Allen et al

Filing 14

ORDER denying 13 Motion to Set Aside Order. Abram hasn't established any proper basis for Rule 60(b) relief from this Court's recent final Order and related Judgment. Abram's new claims and allegations are beyond the scope of his petition as amended. They are, therefore, not properly before the Court on a post-judgment motion. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/14/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION STACY S. ABRAM, IV v. PETITIONER No. 3:13-cv-212-DPM MIKE ALLEN, Sheriff, Crittenden County, Arkansas; STATE OF ARKANSAS; and RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENTS ORDER Motion for reconsideration, NQ 13, denied. Abram hasn't established any proper basis for Rule 60(b) relief from this Court's recent final Order and related Judgment. NQ 11 & 12. Abram's new claims and allegations are beyond the scope of his petition as amended. NQ 2 & 10. They are, therefore, not properly before the Court on a post-judgment motion. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr.~' United States District Judge ;'/ ~ J-0/'f

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?