Crow v. Hall

Filing 14

ORDER adopting 12 proposed findings and recommended disposition in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's 8 motion to dismiss is granted, and Plaintiff' complaint is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/4/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JAMES MARION CROW

v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 3:13CV00219 BSM

MATT HALL

DEFENDANT
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended
disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. Accordingly,
defendant Matt Hall’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 8] is granted, and plaintiff James Crow’s
complaint is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes
of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order
and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of March 2014.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE