Crow v. Hall

Filing 14

ORDER adopting 12 proposed findings and recommended disposition in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's 8 motion to dismiss is granted, and Plaintiff' complaint is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/4/2014. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JAMES MARION CROW v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 3:13CV00219 BSM MATT HALL DEFENDANT ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, defendant Matt Hall’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 8] is granted, and plaintiff James Crow’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of March 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?