Stacy v. Social Security Administration

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Reverse and Remand. The Commissioner's prior decision is reversed and the matter is remanded for further administrative proceedings and issuance of a new decision. This is a "sentence four" remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 4/8/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ANGIE STACY V. PLAINTIFF NO. 3:13CV00233 JTR CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the administrative denial of her claim for Supplemental Security Income. Doc. #2. The Commissioner has filed an Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand, asserting that the case should be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. #14. The Motion states Plaintiff’s counsel was contacted and has no objection to the requested remand. Id. at 4. In the Motion, the Commissioner seeks voluntary remand for the Administrative Law Judge to develop the record, hold a new hearing, re-evaluate the evidence, and conduct further proceedings as necessary, including: (1) determining whether the vocational expert’s responses are consistent with the Dictionary of -1- Occupational Titles; (2) re-evaluating the opinion of the lay witness; and (3) reevaluating Plaintiff’s testimony regarding her ability to perform jobs that require reaching in front of her as well as overhead. Under the circumstances, remand is appropriate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand, Doc. #14, is GRANTED. The Commissioner’s prior decision is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings and issuance of a new decision. This is a “sentence four” remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). DATED this 8th day of April, 2014. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?