Elliott v. Osceola Arkansas, City of

Filing 57

JUDGMENT: Gland Elliot's claims against the City of Osceola are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Elliot's claims against Christopher Ellis for the July 2013 arrest are dismissed without prejudice as Heck-barred. Ell iott's wrongful-arrest and retaliation claims against Ellis for the February 2013 and March 2014 arrests are dismissed with prejudice. The remainder of Elliot's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/20/2015. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
GLAND ELLIOTT

v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 3:13-cv-251-DPM

CITY OF OSCEOLA, ARKANSAS, and
CHRISTOPHER ELLIS

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
1. Gland Elliott's claims against the City of Osceola are dismissed
without prejudice for failure to state a claim.
2. Elliott's claims against Christopher Ellis for the July 2013 arrest are
dismissed without prejudice as Heck-barred.
3. Elliott's wrongful-arrest and retaliation claims against Ellis for the
February 2013 and March 2014 arrests are dismissed with prejudice.
4. The remainder of Elliott's complaint is dismissed without prejudice
for failure to state a claim.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.V
United States District Judge