Williams v. Craighead County et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Craighead County and Bobby Crawford are dismissed from this action and Plaintiff's cause of action is dismissed without p rejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/10/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION RANDY WILLIAMS, v. PLAINTIFF 3:14CV00127-JM-JJV CRAIGHEAD COUNTY; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Craighead County and Bobby Crawford are dismissed from this action. 2. Plaintiff’s cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 3. Dismissal of this action count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 10th day of July, 2014. ____________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?