Warren v. Doe et al
ORDER granting 6 Motion to Amend. His amended complaint should be filed as a supplement to his original complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare summonses for Defendants Davis, Marvell, and Whitfield. The Court will address Mr. Warren's claims against Defendant Cook in a separate recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/6/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HENRY W. WARREN
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-128 KGB/BD
DOE, et al.
Mr. Warren, an inmate at the Mississippi County Detention Facility, filed this
lawsuit pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the Defendants failed to protect him
from an attack by another inmate. (#2) Because his original complaint was deficient, Mr.
Warren was directed to file an amended complaint. (#4) Mr. Warren has now complied
with the Court’s order by moving to amend and by filing an Amended Complaint. (#5,
#6) His motion to amend (#6) is GRANTED. His Amended Complaint should be filed as
a supplement to his original Complaint.
For screening purposes, Mr. Warren has stated a claim against Defendants Davis,
Marvell, and Whitfield. Accordingly, service is proper for those Defendants. The Clerk
of the Court is directed to prepare summonses for these Defendants. Service of process
for these Defendants should be through the Mississippi County Sheriff’s Department, 685
North Country Road 599, Luxora, Arkansas 72358, without prepayment of fees and costs
or posting security.
Service is not proper for the Doe Defendant or Defendant Cook. The Court will
address Mr. Warren’s claims against Defendant Cook in a separate recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of June, 2014.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?