LeFors v. Langston et al
Filing
177
ORDER adopting 174 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants' 158 Motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants Dan Langston, John Cal ley, Ray Brandon, Chad Brandon, T.J. Underwood, and Sammie Johnson are dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies against them. Defendants' request for a "with prejudice" dismissal is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/30/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
HERMAN H. LEFORS, JR.,
ODOC #112524
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:14-cv-00138-KGB-JJV
DAN LANGSTON, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 174). No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part
(Dkt. No. 158). Defendants Dan Langston, John Calley, Ray Brandon, Chad Brandon, T. J.
Underwood, and Sammie Johnson are dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to
exhaust administrative remedies against them.
Defendants’ request for a “with prejudice”
dismissal is denied.
2.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 30th day of July, 2015.
________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?