Rupert et al v. Mills et al

Filing 9

ORDER granting 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket the motion to amend as the Plaintiff's amended and supplemental complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare summons for each of the named Defendant s and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint and the amended complaint, with any attachments, and a summons on these Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 7/28/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION PRENTIS RUPERT and DERRICK BOGAN V. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 3:14-CV-161 JM/BD LARRY MILLS and BECKY HITT DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiffs Prentis Rupert and Derrick Bogan have moved to amend their original complaint to clarify their constitutional claims. (Docket entry #7-1) The motion (#7-1) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket the motion to amend as the Plaintiffs’ amended and supplemental complaint. Based on the allegations contained in the amended complaint, the Plaintiffs have stated a first amendment claim against each of the named Defendants. In addition, Mr. Rupert has stated an equal protection claim against Defendant Hitt. Accordingly, service is now proper. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare summonses for each of the named Defendants. The United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint and the amended complaint, with any attachments, and a summons for these Defendants without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Service for the Defendants should be through the Poinsett County Sheriff’s Department, 1500 Justice Lane, Harrisburg, Arkansas 72432. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of July, 2014. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?