Rupert et al v. Mills et al

Filing 97

ORDER adopting 91 Recommended Disposition in all respects as this Court's findings. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, 82 , is granted. Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed, with prejudice. Mr. Rupert's motion for order, 75 , is denied as moot. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/20/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION PRENTIS RUPERT and DERRICK BOGAN V. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 3:14-CV-161 JM/BD LARRY MILLS and BECKY HITT DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket entry #82) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Mr. Rupert’s motion for order (#75) is DENIED, as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of May, 2015. _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?