Howard v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Company et al

Filing 64

ORDER granting 59 Motion to Stay, provided that Nucor posts a cash bond in the amount of $288,569.92 by 5:00 p.m. on October 22, 2015. The stay will expire at 5:00 p.m. on October 29, 2015, unless Nucor files a notice of appeal, in which case the stay will continue in effect pending appeal. Howard's applications for writ of garnishment and for execution are denied at this time. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/21/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION ROBERT C. HOWARD v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:14CV00202 JLH NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL COMPANY; and JOHN DOES 1-10 DEFENDANTS ORDER Robert Howard has filed an application for writ of garnishment against Wells Fargo Bank, an application for writ of garnishment against Wachovia Bank, and an application for writ of execution. In response, Nucor-Yamato Steel Company has filed a motion for stay of enforcement of the judgment, contending that it has adequate assets to pay any judgment with interest, but also stating that it stands ready, willing, and able to post a cash bond to stay the enforcement of the judgment. Howard has responded, stating that he agrees to the stay of execution until October 29, 2015, provided that Nucor posts a cash bond in the amount of $288,569.92. Nucor’s motion for stay is GRANTED (Document #59), provided that Nucor posts a cash bond in the amount of $288,569.92 by 5:00 p.m., on October 22, 2015. The stay will expire at 5:00 p.m., on October 29, 2015, unless Nucor files a notice of appeal, in which case the stay will continue in effect pending appeal. Howard’s applications for writ of garnishment and for execution are DENIED at this time. Documents #54, #55, and #56. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2015. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?