Wilkes v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Company
Filing
12
ORDER denying 1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Ms. Wilkes is directed to submit the full $400 filing fee within 60 days of the date of this Order. Her failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of her complaint with out prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The Court denies 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. The Court grants 11 Motion for Extension of Time. Wilkes shall have up to and including December 4, 2014, to file her responses to defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Ms. Wilkes. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/12/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
ETTER WILKES
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 3:14-cv-00224-KGB
NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL COMPANY
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Plaintiff Etter Wilkes brings this action pro se against defendant Nucor-Yamato Steel
Company and alleges claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42
U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et
seq. (Dkt. No. 2). Along with the complaint, Ms. Wilkes submitted an application to proceed in
forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 1), which the Clerk of the Court provisionally approved pursuant to
General Order No. 29 (Dkt. No. 4). Based on Ms. Wilkes’s application, she possesses the funds
to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the Court denies Ms. Wilkes’s application to proceed in
forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 1). Ms. Wilkes is directed to pay the full $400 filing fee within 60
days of the date of this Order. Her failure to do so will result in the dismissal without prejudice
of this action.
Also before the Court is Ms. Wilkes’s motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 3).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) and Local Rule 83.7, the Court may appoint counsel for any
person who is proceeding in forma pauperis and unable to afford counsel. Because the Court
denies Ms. Wilkes’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court also denies Ms.
Wilkes’s motion for appointment of counsel.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), it is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to
notify promptly the Clerk of the Court and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in
his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action
diligently. A party appearing for himself or herself shall sign his or her pleadings and state his or
her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se
plaintiff is not responded to within 30 days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any
party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
Also before the Court is Ms. Wilkes’s motion for extension of time to respond to
defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 11).
Ms. Wilkes requests up to and including
November 14, 2014, to file her response to defendant’s motion to dismiss. For good cause
shown, the Court grants Ms. Wilkes’s motion for extension. Because the Court is granting this
motion close to the date requested by Ms. Wilkes, the Court on its own motion extends the time
granted with this extension. Ms. Wilkes shall have up to and including December 4, 2014, to file
her response to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
The Court denies Ms. Wilkes’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt.
No. 1). Ms. Wilkes is directed to submit the full $400 filing fee within 60 days of the date of this
Order. Her failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of her complaint without
prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
2.
The Court denies Ms. Wilkes’s motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 3).
3.
The Court grants Ms. Wilkes’s motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 11). Ms.
Wilkes shall have up and including December 4, 2014, to file her response to defendant’s motion
to dismiss (Dkt. No. 7).
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Ms. Wilkes.
2
SO ORDERED this the 12th day of November, 2014.
_________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?